“Blogs like Shittycop only encourage further terrorism in my state and all other places around the sea of humanity.” … “The rules of SuprBay (which those aren’t, by the way) are no more relevant to blogs on BayWords than the rules of Scrabble.”

ShittycopIs this Baywords blog Shittycop really
appropriate?

17th November 2010, 14:20
Post: #1

Okay, folks I know you’re all for free speech.
You’re all anti-corporate this and anti-corporate that. Okay, full
disclosure: A relative of mine helps beat the living greenbacks out of
’em.
But I am asking you for help. I want you to take a long look at http://ShittyCop.baywords.com.
In
fact, if I posted most of the material on that site here on this
forum you say you’d “attempt to edit or remove” the blog posting
because the “messages” are “containing inappropriate, sexually
orientated, abusive, hateful, slanderous, or threatening material that
could be considered invasive of a persons privacy, or which otherwise
violate any kind of law”.
What Shittycop is all about is NOT exposing police brutality – but
encouraging police brutality. As with other blog service providers –
such as WordPress – Shittycop makes grand headlines and then in fine
print calls for violence against police & urination during their
funerals. Clearly well beyond “inappropriate” into the “hateful” and
“threatening” level.
My hope is that you guys will look into this. Especially since:
a) November the 29th will be a very solemn day in Washington State when
we remember that four (4) coppers were KIA because they were cops by
Maurice Clemmons. Shittycop glorifies that – and other terror attacks.
In fact, I’m one of the Tier One operators chasing this nut off the Internet and already got a
few of its blogs shut down for stuff like taking a real person’s name
w/o consent, calling for violence against police, using webpage
material w/o consent, etcetera.
b) Blogs like Shittycop only encourage further terrorism in my state
and all other places around the sea of humanity. I’m sure Baywords
wants no part of anything
that could lead to a copycat attack to reprise the events documented
here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lakewood_po…r_shooting.

I
just
hope you do the right thing. Thanks!


RE: Is this Baywords blog Shittycop really appropriate?
You will never stop people from believing what they want. The weak
minded will always take the easiest path and allow themselves to be
lead like sheep but will stop at nothing from finding the voice they
need to lead them. The point is taking down this crap will not wipe out
the thoughts expressed on the pages. The stupidity expressed in the
blog is beyond belief:

Quote:PIG DOWN! Racist Riverside Police Regime
Terrorist Ryan Bonaminio DEAD; Riverside County Black Foot Soldiers
Express Relief Bonaminio Can “Racially Profile” No More; Earl Ellis
Green Emerges As Hero In “Resist White Police” Protest

referring to a Riverside CA Police Officer killed after pulling over a
truck REPORTED stolen and the “foot soldier” driver took off on foot,
then ambushed the cop, took the PO’s gun and killed him. Fortunately, CA will soon be with one
less “foot soldier”

RE:
Is
this Baywords blog Shittycop really appropriate?

(17th November 2010 15:29)Adapa Wrote:

(17th November 2010 14:20)CardinalAngel
Wrote:
My hope is that you guys will look into
this.

My hope is that you will look into the First Amendment to the US
Constitution.

Unfortunately as simply and clearly written as it is written: “Congress shall make no law respecting an
establishment
of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech,
or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and
to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” Congress and
state law makers create laws that abridge those rights, is it any
wonder why most Americans now days are at home with the concept of
censorship. Don’t censor, grow a pair, challenge and fight back.

RE:
Is
this Baywords blog Shittycop really appropriate?

(17th November 2010 15:01)bobo66 Wrote: You will never stop people from believing
what they want. The weak minded will always take the easiest path and
allow themselves to be lead like sheep but will stop at nothing from
finding the voice they need to lead them. The point is taking down this
crap will not wipe out the thoughts expressed on the pages. The
stupidity expressed in the blog is beyond belief:

Quote:PIG DOWN! Racist Riverside
Police Regime Terrorist Ryan Bonaminio DEAD; Riverside County Black
Foot Soldiers Express Relief Bonaminio Can “Racially Profile” No More;
Earl Ellis Green Emerges As Hero In “Resist White Police” Protest

referring to a Riverside CA Police Officer killed after pulling over a
truck REPORTED stolen and the “foot soldier” driver took off on foot,
then ambushed the cop, took the PO’s gun and killed him. Fortunately, CA will soon be with one
less “foot soldier”

Yes, this blog is stupid. But Shittycop also incites and encourages violence.
The
question is where do we draw the line?!? I mean if I walked up to
you and threatened you, you’d have a right to report that to the cops.
This blog is threatening cops… shouldn’t you take a stand at some
point?

RE:
Is
this Baywords blog Shittycop really appropriate?

(Yesterday 01:12)CardinalAngel Wrote: Yes, this blog is stupid. But Shittycop
also incites and encourages
violence
. The question is where do we draw the line?!?

The answer is we draw the line at breaking Swedish law, as we’ve
clearly explained: “As long as you don’t break any Swedish laws in your
blog, we will defend it.

Engage a Swedish lawyer to see whether you have any case. If he writes
to us setting out the particulars then we’ll have our lawyer consider
it.

(Yesterday 01:12)CardinalAngel Wrote: I mean if I walked up to you and
threatened you, you’d have a right to report that to the cops. This
blog is threatening cops… shouldn’t you take a stand at some point?

We firmly believe stands should be taken–we’ve taken one ourselves, to
“protect freedom of speech and your thoughts.”
Create a blog of your own. Expose the bullshit. We’ll defend your
freedom of speech too.

RE:
Is
this Baywords blog Shittycop really appropriate?

(Yesterday 01:52)Adapa Wrote:

(Yesterday 01:12)CardinalAngel Wrote: Yes, this blog is stupid. But Shittycop
also incites and encourages
violence
. The question is where do we draw the line?!?

The answer is we draw the line at breaking Swedish law, as we’ve
clearly explained: “As long as you don’t break any Swedish laws in your
blog, we will defend it.
Engage a Swedish lawyer to see whether you
have any case. If he writes to us setting out the particulars then
we’ll have our lawyer consider it.

(Yesterday 01:12)CardinalAngel Wrote: I mean if I walked up to you and
threatened you, you’d have a right to report that to the cops. This
blog is threatening cops… shouldn’t you take a stand at some point?

We firmly believe stands should be taken–we’ve taken one ourselves, to
“protect freedom of speech and your thoughts.” Create a blog of your
own. Expose the bullshit. We’ll defend your freedom of speech too.

Well at least we agree on something. I just might start one to “expose
the bullshit”… Just can’t afford a Sweedish lawyer.

RE:
Is
this Baywords blog Shittycop really appropriate?

(17th November 2010 14:20)CardinalAngel Wrote:
Okay, folks I know you’re all for free
speech.
You’re all anti-corporate this and anti-corporate that. Okay, full
disclosure: A relative of mine helps beat the living greenbacks out of
’em.
But I am asking you for help. I want you to take a long look at http://ShittyCop.baywords.com.
In
fact, if I posted most of the material on that site here on this
forum you say you’d “attempt to edit or remove” the blog posting
because the “messages” are “containing inappropriate, sexually
orientated, abusive, hateful, slanderous, or threatening material that
could be considered invasive of a persons privacy, or which otherwise
violate any kind of law”.
What Shittycop is all about is NOT exposing police brutality – but
encouraging police brutality. As with other blog service providers –
such as WordPress – Shittycop makes grand headlines and then in fine
print calls for violence against police & urination during their
funerals. Clearly well beyond “inappropriate” into the “hateful” and
“threatening” level.
My hope is that you guys will look into this. Especially since:
a) November the 29th will be a very solemn day in Washington State when
we remember that four (4) coppers were KIA because they were cops by
Maurice Clemmons. Shittycop glorifies that – and other terror attacks.
In fact, I’m one of the Tier One operators chasing this nut off the Internet and already got a
few of its blogs shut down for stuff like taking a real person’s name
w/o consent, calling for violence against police, using webpage
material w/o consent, etcetera.
b) Blogs like Shittycop only encourage further terrorism in my state
and all other places around the sea of humanity. I’m sure Baywords
wants no part of anything
that could lead to a copycat attack to reprise the events documented
here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lakewood_po…r_shooting.

I
just
hope you do the right thing. Thanks!

Cardinal Angel, I didn’t see the appropriate disclaimer you should have
used before making your charge: “in my opinion.”
I’m a Shittycop fan and recognize it IS about exposing police brutality
and fighting against racial terrorists like you who strive to eliminate
the minority voice for calling you and the racially terrorist police
you embrace what you are.
The four men Maurice Clemmons witnessed to in that coffee shop that
glorious day were not and had never been “police.” Is that what you’re
mad about: somebody calling you what you are to those you terrorize
rather than what you present yourself as to your racially terroristic
allies.
You noted that:

Quote:What
Shittycop
is all about is NOT exposing police brutality – but
encouraging police brutality. As with other blog service providers –
such as WordPress – Shittycop makes grand headlines and then in fine
print calls for violence against police & urination during their
funerals. Clearly well beyond “inappropriate” into the “hateful” and
“threatening” level.

LOL! Press on with your campaign liar. Chase your tail! There is a
community of us and, one way or another, we will always call you what
you are. Our voices will always be heard.


(17th November 2010 15:29)Adapa Wrote:

(17th November 2010 14:20)CardinalAngel
Wrote:
Okay, folks I know you’re all for free
speech.

…but you figured you’d ask us to renege on our principles anyway. Rolleyes

(17th November 2010 14:20)CardinalAngel
Wrote:
In fact, if I posted most of the material
on that site here on this forum you say you’d “attempt to edit or
remove” the blog posting because the “messages” are “containing
inappropriate, sexually orientated, abusive, hateful, slanderous, or
threatening material that could be considered invasive of a persons
privacy, or which otherwise violate any kind of law”.

The rules of SuprBay (which those aren’t, by the way) are no more
relevant to blogs on BayWords than the rules of Scrabble.

(17th November 2010 14:20)CardinalAngel
Wrote:
My hope is that you guys will look into
this.

My hope is that you will look into the First Amendment to the US
Constitution.

(17th November 2010 14:20)CardinalAngel
Wrote:
I just hope you do the right thing.

We’ll certainly do that.

Adapa, there is a community who appreciates what you do and the rights
you strive to protect against 1st Amendment terrorists who, through
racially subjective manipulation, campaign to silence those who expose
them for the frauds they are.
There are no calls for violence against “police.” There are calls to
protect selves from racial terrorists. All calls for protests at the
funerals of these State supported racial terrorists we live in fear of
are prefaced with “don’t.”
As a Shittycop community member, I know, as the disclaimer states, it
doesn’t promote or support violence against whites or police. Rather,
it is about knowing our rights and defending ourselves against the type
of historic racial terrorism “Cardinal Angel” is presenting in this
very forum.


Malice Jordan

About cardinalangel
What Shittycop is all about is NOT exposing police brutality - but encouraging police brutality. As with other blog service providers - such as Wordpress - Shittycop makes grand headlines and then in fine print calls for violence against police & urination during their funerals. Clearly well beyond "inappropriate" into the "hateful" and "threatening" level.

2 Responses to “Blogs like Shittycop only encourage further terrorism in my state and all other places around the sea of humanity.” … “The rules of SuprBay (which those aren’t, by the way) are no more relevant to blogs on BayWords than the rules of Scrabble.”

  1. ShittycopIs this Baywords blog Shittycop really
    appropriate?

    17th November 2010, 14:20
    Post: #1

    Okay, folks I know you’re all for free speech.
    You’re all anti-corporate this and anti-corporate that. Okay, full
    disclosure: A relative of mine helps beat the living greenbacks out of
    ’em.
    But I am asking you for help. I want you to take a long look at http://ShittyCop.baywords.com.
    In
    fact, if I posted most of the material on that site here on this
    forum you say you’d “attempt to edit or remove” the blog posting
    because the “messages” are “containing inappropriate, sexually
    orientated, abusive, hateful, slanderous, or threatening material that
    could be considered invasive of a persons privacy, or which otherwise
    violate any kind of law”.
    What Shittycop is all about is NOT exposing police brutality – but
    encouraging police brutality. As with other blog service providers –
    such as WordPress – Shittycop makes grand headlines and then in fine
    print calls for violence against police & urination during their
    funerals. Clearly well beyond “inappropriate” into the “hateful” and
    “threatening” level.
    My hope is that you guys will look into this. Especially since:
    a) November the 29th will be a very solemn day in Washington State when
    we remember that four (4) coppers were KIA because they were cops by
    Maurice Clemmons. Shittycop glorifies that – and other terror attacks.
    In fact, I’m one of the Tier One operators chasing this nut off the Internet and already got a
    few of its blogs shut down for stuff like taking a real person’s name
    w/o consent, calling for violence against police, using webpage
    material w/o consent, etcetera.
    b) Blogs like Shittycop only encourage further terrorism in my state
    and all other places around the sea of humanity. I’m sure Baywords
    wants no part of anything
    that could lead to a copycat attack to reprise the events documented
    here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lakewood_po…r_shooting.

    I
    just
    hope you do the right thing. Thanks!


    RE: Is this Baywords blog Shittycop really appropriate?
    You will never stop people from believing what they want. The weak
    minded will always take the easiest path and allow themselves to be
    lead like sheep but will stop at nothing from finding the voice they
    need to lead them. The point is taking down this crap will not wipe out
    the thoughts expressed on the pages. The stupidity expressed in the
    blog is beyond belief:

    Quote:PIG DOWN! Racist Riverside Police Regime
    Terrorist Ryan Bonaminio DEAD; Riverside County Black Foot Soldiers
    Express Relief Bonaminio Can “Racially Profile” No More; Earl Ellis
    Green Emerges As Hero In “Resist White Police” Protest

    referring to a Riverside CA Police Officer killed after pulling over a
    truck REPORTED stolen and the “foot soldier” driver took off on foot,
    then ambushed the cop, took the PO’s gun and killed him. Fortunately, CA will soon be with one
    less “foot soldier”

     
     
    RE:
    Is
    this Baywords blog Shittycop really appropriate?

    (17th November 2010 15:29)Adapa Wrote:

    (17th November 2010 14:20)CardinalAngel
    Wrote:
    My hope is that you guys will look into
    this.

    My hope is that you will look into the First Amendment to the US
    Constitution.

    Unfortunately as simply and clearly written as it is written: “Congress shall make no law respecting an
    establishment
    of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech,
    or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and
    to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” Congress and
    state law makers create laws that abridge those rights, is it any
    wonder why most Americans now days are at home with the concept of
    censorship. Don’t censor, grow a pair, challenge and fight back.

     

    RE:
    Is
    this Baywords blog Shittycop really appropriate?

    (17th November 2010 15:01)bobo66 Wrote: You will never stop people from believing
    what they want. The weak minded will always take the easiest path and
    allow themselves to be lead like sheep but will stop at nothing from
    finding the voice they need to lead them. The point is taking down this
    crap will not wipe out the thoughts expressed on the pages. The
    stupidity expressed in the blog is beyond belief:

    Quote:PIG DOWN! Racist Riverside
    Police Regime Terrorist Ryan Bonaminio DEAD; Riverside County Black
    Foot Soldiers Express Relief Bonaminio Can “Racially Profile” No More;
    Earl Ellis Green Emerges As Hero In “Resist White Police” Protest

    referring to a Riverside CA Police Officer killed after pulling over a
    truck REPORTED stolen and the “foot soldier” driver took off on foot,
    then ambushed the cop, took the PO’s gun and killed him. Fortunately, CA will soon be with one
    less “foot soldier”

    Yes, this blog is stupid. But Shittycop also incites and encourages violence.
    The
    question is where do we draw the line?!? I mean if I walked up to
    you and threatened you, you’d have a right to report that to the cops.
    This blog is threatening cops… shouldn’t you take a stand at some
    point?

    RE:
    Is
    this Baywords blog Shittycop really appropriate?

    (Yesterday 01:12)CardinalAngel Wrote: Yes, this blog is stupid. But Shittycop
    also incites and encourages
    violence
    . The question is where do we draw the line?!? 

    The answer is we draw the line at breaking Swedish law, as we’ve
    clearly explained: “As long as you don’t break any Swedish laws in your
    blog, we will defend it.

    Engage a Swedish lawyer to see whether you have any case. If he writes
    to us setting out the particulars then we’ll have our lawyer consider
    it.

    (Yesterday 01:12)CardinalAngel Wrote: I mean if I walked up to you and
    threatened you, you’d have a right to report that to the cops. This
    blog is threatening cops… shouldn’t you take a stand at some point?

    We firmly believe stands should be taken–we’ve taken one ourselves, to
    “protect freedom of speech and your thoughts.”
    Create a blog of your own. Expose the bullshit. We’ll defend your
    freedom of speech too.

    RE:
    Is
    this Baywords blog Shittycop really appropriate?

    (Yesterday 01:52)Adapa Wrote:

    (Yesterday 01:12)CardinalAngel Wrote: Yes, this blog is stupid. But Shittycop
    also incites and encourages
    violence
    . The question is where do we draw the line?!?

    The answer is we draw the line at breaking Swedish law, as we’ve
    clearly explained: “As long as you don’t break any Swedish laws in your
    blog, we will defend it.
    Engage a Swedish lawyer to see whether you
    have any case. If he writes to us setting out the particulars then
    we’ll have our lawyer consider it.

    (Yesterday 01:12)CardinalAngel Wrote: I mean if I walked up to you and
    threatened you, you’d have a right to report that to the cops. This
    blog is threatening cops… shouldn’t you take a stand at some point?

    We firmly believe stands should be taken–we’ve taken one ourselves, to
    “protect freedom of speech and your thoughts.” Create a blog of your
    own. Expose the bullshit. We’ll defend your freedom of speech too.

    Well at least we agree on something. I just might start one to “expose
    the bullshit”… Just can’t afford a Sweedish lawyer.

    RE:
    Is
    this Baywords blog Shittycop really appropriate?

    (17th November 2010 14:20)CardinalAngel Wrote:
    Okay, folks I know you’re all for free
    speech.
    You’re all anti-corporate this and anti-corporate that. Okay, full
    disclosure: A relative of mine helps beat the living greenbacks out of
    ’em.
    But I am asking you for help. I want you to take a long look at http://ShittyCop.baywords.com.
    In
    fact, if I posted most of the material on that site here on this
    forum you say you’d “attempt to edit or remove” the blog posting
    because the “messages” are “containing inappropriate, sexually
    orientated, abusive, hateful, slanderous, or threatening material that
    could be considered invasive of a persons privacy, or which otherwise
    violate any kind of law”.
    What Shittycop is all about is NOT exposing police brutality – but
    encouraging police brutality. As with other blog service providers –
    such as WordPress – Shittycop makes grand headlines and then in fine
    print calls for violence against police & urination during their
    funerals. Clearly well beyond “inappropriate” into the “hateful” and
    “threatening” level.
    My hope is that you guys will look into this. Especially since:
    a) November the 29th will be a very solemn day in Washington State when
    we remember that four (4) coppers were KIA because they were cops by
    Maurice Clemmons. Shittycop glorifies that – and other terror attacks.
    In fact, I’m one of the Tier One operators chasing this nut off the Internet and already got a
    few of its blogs shut down for stuff like taking a real person’s name
    w/o consent, calling for violence against police, using webpage
    material w/o consent, etcetera.
    b) Blogs like Shittycop only encourage further terrorism in my state
    and all other places around the sea of humanity. I’m sure Baywords
    wants no part of anything
    that could lead to a copycat attack to reprise the events documented
    here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lakewood_po…r_shooting.

    I
    just
    hope you do the right thing. Thanks! 

    Cardinal Angel, I didn’t see the appropriate disclaimer you should have
    used before making your charge: “in my opinion.”
    I’m a Shittycop fan and recognize it IS about exposing police brutality
    and fighting against racial terrorists like you who strive to eliminate
    the minority voice for calling you and the racially terrorist police
    you embrace what you are.
    The four men Maurice Clemmons witnessed to in that coffee shop that
    glorious day were not and had never been “police.” Is that what you’re
    mad about: somebody calling you what you are to those you terrorize
    rather than what you present yourself as to your racially terroristic
    allies.
    You noted that:

    Quote:What
    Shittycop
    is all about is NOT exposing police brutality – but
    encouraging police brutality. As with other blog service providers –
    such as WordPress – Shittycop makes grand headlines and then in fine
    print calls for violence against police & urination during their
    funerals. Clearly well beyond “inappropriate” into the “hateful” and
    “threatening” level.
     

    LOL! Press on with your campaign liar. Chase your tail! There is a
    community of us and, one way or another, we will always call you what
    you are. Our voices will always be heard.


    (17th November 2010 15:29)Adapa Wrote:

    (17th November 2010 14:20)CardinalAngel
    Wrote:
    Okay, folks I know you’re all for free
    speech. 

    …but you figured you’d ask us to renege on our principles anyway. Rolleyes

    (17th November 2010 14:20)CardinalAngel
    Wrote:
    In fact, if I posted most of the material
    on that site here on this forum you say you’d “attempt to edit or
    remove” the blog posting because the “messages” are “containing
    inappropriate, sexually orientated, abusive, hateful, slanderous, or
    threatening material that could be considered invasive of a persons
    privacy, or which otherwise violate any kind of law”.

    The rules of SuprBay (which those aren’t, by the way) are no more
    relevant to blogs on BayWords than the rules of Scrabble.

    (17th November 2010 14:20)CardinalAngel
    Wrote:
    My hope is that you guys will look into
    this.

    My hope is that you will look into the First Amendment to the US
    Constitution.

    (17th November 2010 14:20)CardinalAngel
    Wrote:
    I just hope you do the right thing.

    We’ll certainly do that.

    Adapa, there is a community who appreciates what you do and the rights
    you strive to protect against 1st Amendment terrorists who, through
    racially subjective manipulation, campaign to silence those who expose
    them for the frauds they are.
    There are no calls for violence against “police.” There are calls to
    protect selves from racial terrorists. All calls for protests at the
    funerals of these State supported racial terrorists we live in fear of
    are prefaced with “don’t.”
    As a Shittycop community member, I know, as the disclaimer states, it
    doesn’t promote or support violence against whites or police. Rather,
    it is about knowing our rights and defending ourselves against the type
    of historic racial terrorism “Cardinal Angel” is presenting in this
    very forum.


    Malice Jordan

  2. Rachel says:

    I guess inorance is bliss. You thank god but he is looking at what you are saying. Well god bless your first amendment right and I hope your grammar gets better.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: